—

### Redefining Nurse Practitioner Education with Standardized Affiliation Agreements: A Step Towards a More Efficient Future

The nurse practitioner (NP) profession is swiftly growing, propelled by increasing healthcare demands and a shifting emphasis on advanced practice providers. However, one ongoing issue continues to hinder NP education: the preceptor shortage—particularly, the cumbersome process of securing clinical placements due to the lack of standardized affiliation agreements (SAA). During a discussion on *The Podcast by KevinMD*, Lynn McComas, CEO and founder of PreceptorLink, highlighted how SAAs could transform the clinical training environment for nurse practitioners and advanced practice providers.

—

### The Challenge: Disparate Affiliation Agreements

Affiliation agreements are foundational to clinical education. These legal documents formalize partnerships between educational institutions and clinical sites. In their absence, students are unable to complete crucial hands-on training with preceptors. However, this presents a significant challenge:

1. **Lack of Standardization**: There are more than 500 nurse practitioner programs across the United States, each utilizing its own version of an affiliation agreement. This inconsistent framework results in delays, bureaucratic hurdles, and redundant expenses.
2. **Lengthy Procedure**: The creation of a new affiliation agreement often spans months and requires extensive negotiations between legal departments. Clinical sites may turn away students simply because their institution does not have an agreement in place.
3. **Access Obstacles**: Major healthcare entities, like hospitals, restrict the number of schools they collaborate with to minimize legal and administrative pressures, thus leaving students in search of clinical training options.
4. **Consequences for Students**: Without access to clinical locations, future nurse practitioners endure longer program lengths, increased expenses, and lost educational opportunities, which furthermore exacerbates the preceptor shortage.

—

### A Viable Solution: The Standardized Affiliation Agreement (SAA)

Inspired by the “Common Application” used in higher education admissions and the *Uniform Clinical Training Affiliation Agreement (UCTAA)* utilized by medical institutions, McComas suggested establishing a similar framework for nurse practitioners. The UCTAA, designed by the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC), illustrates how standardization can remove obstacles in clinical education. By modifying this model for nursing programs, the SAA could provide a groundbreaking remedy.

**Key Advantages of the SAA Model**:

1. **Simplified Procedures**: A standardized contract would eliminate the need for legal discussions with each new partnership, conserving time and resources for both clinical sites and educational institutions.
2. **Increased Access**: By alleviating the administrative load, a greater number of clinical sites might be more inclined to welcome students from a wider array of schools.
3. **More Effective Use of Resources**: Educational institutions and clinical sites could prioritize student education and patient care instead of legalities.
4. **Cost Savings**: Streamlining the agreement process could lead to significant savings for nursing schools, as demonstrated by the Graduate Nursing Education Demonstration Project in Florida.

Specifically, SAAs could resolve issues related to liability, supervisory roles, and other essential requirements while allowing schools and clinical sites to append specific modifications for individual situations.

—

### Obstacles to Execution

Despite the potential of SAAs, considerable obstacles persist:

1. **Bureaucratic Reluctance**: Attempts to engage professional nursing organizations and academic leaders have faced resistance or indifference. Numerous institutions remain committed to traditional, institution-specific agreements.
2. **Diversity in State and Institutional Standards**: Achieving standardization across all 50 states, each with distinct regulations and credentialing requirements, could pose a challenge.
3. **Disparate Stakeholder Engagement**: Various nursing organizations (e.g., the National Organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculties, American Association of Nurse Practitioners) would need to work together to embrace and advance the SAA initiative.

Nonetheless, McComas remains hopeful that the successful implementation of the UCTAA in medical fields demonstrates the possibility of transformative change in nursing.

—

### The Promising Influence: A Vision for Tomorrow

Should nurse practitioner education incorporate SAAs, the profession could witness significant evolution.

– **For Students**: Gaining clinical placements would become a more manageable, efficient experience, ensuring greater access to clinical sites while shortening graduation delays.
– **For Schools**: Educational institutions could cut costs, reallocating those funds towards enhancing resources for education and innovation.
– **For Clinical Sites**: Dismissing bureaucratic barriers would motivate more private practices and hospitals to engage in the education of future NPs, thereby directly addressing the preceptor shortage.

On a broader scale, SAAs could establish a foundation for improved collaboration among other advanced practice professional programs, including physician assistant (PA) studies, nursing programs, and interprofessional initiatives.

—

### Call for Action: Promoting Change

Nursing educators, clinical site managers, and national organizations must