Conditions,Health IT “Utilizing AI for Responsible Speech Therapy: An Appeal to Developers, Administrators, and Corporations”

“Utilizing AI for Responsible Speech Therapy: An Appeal to Developers, Administrators, and Corporations”

"Utilizing AI for Responsible Speech Therapy: An Appeal to Developers, Administrators, and Corporations"


**Harnessing the Power of Voice: The Essential Function of Speech-Language Pathology and AI in Communication Recovery**

Communication stands as one of the most profound and essential elements of human life. It serves as our medium to share thoughts, convey feelings, establish connections, and leave an enduring impact on our surroundings. Nevertheless, for countless individuals grappling with communication disorders, this crucial component of humanity can be transient or out of reach. Whether stemming from developmental delays, strokes, neurodegenerative disorders, or traumatic injuries, the inability to communicate presents not only a logistical hurdle but a profound existential challenge—impacting identity, autonomy, and the core of existence.

As a speech-language pathologist (SLP), I observe directly the transformative possibilities of regaining the ability to communicate. My practice includes children facing delayed language development, adults recovering from strokes, and seniors dealing with conditions such as Parkinson’s disease. In each situation, the primary objective remains evident: to foster connections, promote autonomy, and restore dignity. However, reaching these objectives often resembles traversing a maze of systemic obstacles, limited resources, and unequal access. It is within this precarious balance of determination and inequity that cutting-edge technologies like artificial intelligence (AI) present both exciting potential and pressing concerns.

### Communication as a Fundamental Right

Communication is not an exclusive privilege; it is a basic right. This tenet is enshrined in the **Communication Bill of Rights**, issued by the National Joint Committee for the Communication Needs of Persons with Severe Disabilities. This pivotal framework illustrates that every individual, irrespective of ability or diagnosis, is entitled to express themselves, make decisions, and access the necessary systems for communication. These rights demand community support, whether through technology, training, or advocacy.

Yet, longstanding systemic disparities frequently make these rights unreachable. For numerous patients, communication resources—such as advanced therapies or assistive devices—are withheld rather than provided as a certainty. These obstacles do not represent what is clinically feasible but are indicative of systemic limitations prioritizing cost over care. There is an urgent need for innovative tools and methods to shift this reality towards a more equitable and compassionate future.

### A Patient’s Experience: Maneuvering a System of Constraints

One patient’s experience is etched in my memory—a stark illustration of both the shortcomings and unrealized potential within our systems. This patient, a middle-aged man recovering from a devastating stroke, encountered a trifecta of challenges that left him extremely vulnerable: **global aphasia** (a profound loss of language comprehension and production), **apraxia of speech** (difficulty coordinating speech movements), and **dysphagia** (trouble swallowing). Furthermore, significant mobility issues meant he depended on various disciplines—speech therapy, physical therapy, and occupational therapy—to regain any semblance of independence.

Despite his resolve and the skills of his clinicians, the system restrained his recovery at every stage. Here’s how:

1. **Acute Care:** Upon entering an acute hospital, he was allocated 15–30 minutes of speech therapy each day during a 30-day hospital stay. In this phase, the focus of speech therapy was primarily on swallowing and safety, leaving minimal time for advancing communication skills.

2. **Inpatient Rehabilitation:** After achieving medical stability, his therapeutic hours increased to one hour each day. Yet, even in this more focused environment, therapy was limited to three weeks due to insurance regulations and cost-containment priorities.

3. **Subacute Rehabilitation and Skilled Nursing:** Transitioning to subacute and later skilled nursing facilities, therapy sessions were reduced to just 25 minutes daily, reliant on insurance approvals. Therapy became sporadic and reactive, constrained by productivity mandates and understaffing.

Ultimately, these limitations—with their emphasis on short-term cost efficiency rather than long-term health outcomes—let him down. To my knowledge, he never exited the skilled nursing facility, his recovery potential hindered not by his commitment but by systemic inadequacies.

This man, like so many others, merited better. Although clinicians pushed for every possible option within their capabilities, they were constrained by the cumbersome realities of an underfunded, profit-driven healthcare landscape.

### The Potential (and Boundaries) of AI in Speech Therapy

At its finest, artificial intelligence could revolutionize the care trajectory for patients like him. AI-enabled tools have the capacity to expand the reach of speech-language pathologists, assist caregivers, and empower patients to actively participate in the world even when clinicians are not available. Imagine:

– **Immediate Support for Communication Efforts:** AI resources could aid patients during interactions with family members, nurses, or aides—even those lacking training in communication techniques. Immediate feedback and adaptable assistance could help transform each interaction into a meaningful exchange.

– **Discovering Patterns in Daily Efforts:** While patients may appear quiet or disheartened during clinical appointments, significant communication efforts might emerge in solitary moments—through gestures, vocalizations, or even internal thought processes. AI could analyze these patterns to reveal new insights.